QUOTE(Platinum @ Jun 8 2011, 08:20 PM)

Ok, time to review this album now that ive heard it.
It's decent. It's not great. It's on par with the last two albums, nowhere near Highly Evolved.
They said there were 40 songs that didn't make the cut. So "Outro" is better than those other 40? I don't think I wanna hear those, haha.
Anyways, what we have here, once again, for the third time in a row, is a collection of decent melodies that could have been so much more. I was so happy to see some songs over 3 minutes, but those songs ended up being 2 minute songs with a minute and a half of "feedback filler." Hell, that's all that Outro is! The band says the short songs are just their style, but I have a hard time believing that. Their first two albums were full of long, well thought out songs that kept bringing you surprises till the very end. The songs on this album have so little to them, verse chorus verse chorus (5 second solo that mimmicks the melody) verse chorus... and they come to a end at 2 mintues...and they rightly should. thats one thing i have to give them credit for, they aren't stretching simple ideas too far. It's hard for me to really critique these songs because there's nothing horrible about the content we have. There's just so little that we were given here. I've listened to the album about 5 times and I already know it by heart, which goes to show two things
1.) The content is short and simple
2.) The content is catchy enough to remember
Being short and sweet is not a bad thing. Songs like "Orange Amber," "Highly Evolved," and "Don't Listen to The Radio" are perfect just the way they are. Imagine how dissatisfying a song like "Mary Jane" would be if it was stripped of it epicness, shortened to 2 minutes. In short, I like the content on this album, but just when I'm getting into it, the song is over, leaving me thinking "....that's it?"
I want all of you to listen to "1969". The song is almost seven minutes long, and new guitar riffs, guitar hooks, and melodies appear right up until the very end of the song (not to mention the dynamics.) There was clearly a TON of thought put into it, and it shows. That's the kinda song that can really blow you away, making you think "wow...how did they think of that...what a song!" I feel like you could tear "1969" apart and make at least 3 songs out of it by New Vines Album standards.
For Vines fans, I'd definitely say check this album out. It's decent but not great. I'd be skeptical about showing this album to a non-vines fan, however. If i had to rate it, I'd probably give it a 6/10.
I want The Vines to do well, and I know Craig can do better than what he's put out on recent records. Their debut album was great, mainly because you could tell that it was all the best ideas Craig ever had for songwriting that piled up over his lifetime. Ever since then he's had about 2 years to try and come up with an equally great bunch...not an easy task at all. I hope the band realizes how important it is to fine tune your songs, it makes all the difference in the world. For example, let's take "Country Yard." It has two great things going for it: The melody is GREAT, and there is a GREAT guitar part dancing underneath it. If "Country Yard" was written for this record, I feel like it would have been accompanied by simple guitar strumming, rather than the note-for-note plucking intro that carries the song so well, and probably wouldn't have been quite as long. Let's even take "Ride" for example. The melody is pretty good, but what really kicks your teeth in is that opening riff. It's a short song, but it has a lot going for it.
I hope I've made my point. Obviously Craig can still write a song. I just wish when the band went to record the songs, they put a little more effort on how they could add some meat to the bones. Decent effort, but I'm hoping for more next time around, for my own enjoyment AND for the sake of the band.
QFT
(Been a forum user before (Highly Evolved - Winning Days Era), despite this being a "first post from this account")
This, pretty much. Except, I'm a lot less forgiving on the band. I agree with a lot of the views that Platinum had. I feel as if The Vines are more capable of what they've been producing so far.
When Vision Valley came out, I was excited that the band was making a come back, however I couldn't help but feel disappointed that the songs were so short. Whatever, they're just getting back into the groove of things, and that's fine; it's a step towards progress. But, then they came out with Melodia.
Again, short songs, but they weren't even of the quality that Vision Valley had. VV had songs on it that I felt that while they were short, they could have been epic songs if they were longer and more complex. But, Melodia was just... simple and kind of cheap. Over time, I eventually developed a sort of... loathing of the album because I felt that it was lazy, uninspired, etc.
And now, after listening to Future Primitive, I find myself abhorring it worse.
Although, I'm not going to just endlessly rip on the album (trust me I could) without trying to explain my reasoning. I suppose I'm just disappointed, because some of the songs on Future Primitive just seem so... corny that it's nearly painful to listen to at times. I'm beginning to believe that The Vines are attempting to jump back onto the 'catchy' band-wagon with hopes that it will re-ignite their career again. But they're missing the important element that they had in Highly Evolved...
Effort.
Now, obviously, Craig had his whole life to write that album... But, I thought Winning Days was an excellent album too and Vision Valley was... okay - at best. So, it's really no excuse.
But, like I said before; they just seem to be getting lazier and lazier. They may try to say "shorter songs are more their style" but, I find that comment a bit hard to take seriously when I know that they're so much more capable of creating really epic songs, such as 1969, In the Jungle, Animal Machine, etc. I don't know, I guess whenever I listen to those songs, I find myself feeling just... really disappointed with the band.
Sort of like what Platinum had said... The band had forty songs to pick from and these were the ones that made it? :s Eeek. I REALLY loved A.S.4... That one was really good. But some of them just made me facepalm at how silly they sounded and it sort of makes me fear what the other songs could have possibly been...
Now, if this is the route that The Vines wish to take with their music, then by all means, that is their prerogative. Though I'm pretty sure I've lost my patience with them... I realize that my post may make me sound like a big lady-dick, but. *shrugs* It's just my opinion and everyone is of course entitled to their's. However, my opinion is that I think some people also give this album way more credit than it deserves... Same with Melodia. They were both just... bad. : / That doesn't mean my opinion is right of course, but, it's just the way I feel so... *raspberries*
The only strength Future Primitive has over Melodia is that it at least has some songs on it that make me think it could have been a good album is some of the songs (like Future Primitive itself) were longer and more thoughtful.
But, I kind of feel like The Vines have reached a point with me to where they're just saying, "Ah, fuck you, you'll buy it."