I know i'll probably get crucified for saying this: i love the new album but come on, no song should EVER be under 2 minutes on a full lenght album. I might aswell listen to the 'Intermissions' on the Offspring albums. i know you'll all say that who cares how long the song is if its good..well i do.

It's like Weezer's green album which was a lil under 30 mins i think, great cd but come on..add some riffs or something!

just my two cents

So wait, you'd rather have longer, less good songs than brilliant short ones? Because seriously - these songs would be less good when longer.

I guess yes i'd rather have a couple minutes more, i guess it's just i want more bang for my buck
it's like a friend said to me when i complained about Radiohead's Kid A album which i think had only 10 songs, he said 'would you rather have 10 great songs or 10 great songs and 3 okay ones' i said i wanted 13 songs heh

well I got enough bang for my buck

*I* say the longer the better

Songs or ... whatever

where's that in the album rulebook?

to try and add longer intros/outros/verses/guitar bridges with no purpose except to lengthen a song is lame. craig intended for the songs to be what they are, and i personally respect his vision of that. i really ruley do.

Aww, and for that comment I love Jen...I really ruley do too

I guess the Ramones were doing it all wrong then...

short songs can be great.

just go see the hives live.

Short and sweet.
All it does is make you wanna to it listen again..and again. But then again, a vines song doesnt have to be short to make you wanna hear it again.